Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acad Med ; 96(11): 1564-1568, 2021 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34406131

RESUMO

PROBLEM: The potential for community-engaged research to address health inequity requires deliberate effort to create trusting and equitable community-academic partnerships. A lack of evidence-based opportunities for cultivating such partnerships remains a barrier. APPROACH: In 2017 and 2018, the authors designed, facilitated, and evaluated a mixed stakeholder training, Communicating to Engage, at 2 urban academic medical centers involved in the All of Us research program, Boston Medical Center and Mass General Brigham. The goal was to bring together researchers and community members to develop communication skills through improvisational theater-based co-learning. The curriculum was inspired by several evidence-based learning frameworks including community-based participatory research principles and improvisational theater techniques. A self-administered survey completed before and after the training session measured participants' communication skills using the Self-Perceived Communication Competence Scale (SPCCS) and comfort with specific communication styles as outlined in the program's training objectives. Paired t tests were used to measure changes in scaled responses among combined participants and separately among self-identified community members and researchers. OUTCOMES: Sixty-nine total participants across 6 workshops completed training evaluations. Overall, pre-post survey analysis demonstrated significant mean score improvement for both the SPCCS and comfort with specific communication styles. In stratified analysis, both community members (n = 26) and researchers (n = 38) reported significant improvement in scores related to comfort with specific communication styles. Only researchers, but not community members, had significant improvement in SPCCS scores. NEXT STEPS: The Communicating to Engage program brought community and researcher stakeholders together and demonstrated improvement in self-perceived communication styles, yet researcher participants benefited more than community participants. Future innovation is necessary to further target community stakeholder communication training needs. Mixed stakeholder improvisational theater-based learning provides deliberate opportunities to build new community-academic partnerships that may enhance health equity initiatives.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade/métodos , Relações Comunidade-Instituição/normas , Pesquisadores/educação , Participação dos Interessados/psicologia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Adulto , Idoso , Boston/epidemiologia , Comunicação , Educação Baseada em Competências/métodos , Currículo , Feminino , Equidade em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Autoimagem , Habilidades Sociais , Confiança/psicologia
2.
Prog Community Health Partnersh ; 13(2): 209-217, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31178456

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Boston University Clinical & Translational Science Institute (BU CTSI) identified a local need to increase the capacity of members of a diverse inner-city community with no prior knowledge of research to partner with researchers along the research continuum. OBJECTIVES: To design, implement, and evaluate an introductory- level capacity-building training using community pedagogy and providing information about current research and opportunities to partner with local researchers. METHODS: Guided by two advisory boards of community-engaged professionals and patients, the community engagement team of the BU CTSI designed, implemented, and evaluated the Connecting Community to Research (CCR) training program. We targeted existing community groups in Boston interested in partnering with an academic institution to advance the health of their community. Interactive trainings focused on principles of community-engaged research (CEnR), and how individual experiences might influence research. Each session offered real-time opportunities for participants to engage with local researchers on existing research such as joining a local research advisory group or institutional review board. Self-administered surveys captured participant experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Over 1 year, we trained 100 community members and almost all participants felt that the objectives of the training program were met and the information was relevant. More than 50% of the participants took advantage of partnership opportunities with local researchers. A toolkit was designed and disseminated to support others to replicate the program. We demonstrated that an interactive training curriculum designed with a community-engaged pedagogy and supported by opportunities for engagement has the ability to successfully partner community members with academic researchers.


Assuntos
Fortalecimento Institucional/métodos , Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade/métodos , Relações Comunidade-Instituição , Pesquisadores/educação , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Boston , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , População Urbana , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...